Abiotic factors

Preceding frequent abiotic stress can acclimatize plants by inducing a change in the epigenetic state, and the persistence of the induced state can be plastic. The epigenetic regulation of the abiotic stress response is complex in nature and could be interlinked with genetic networks or can be an independent event. From literature, we could observe a gap in in-depth studies conducted in natural populations. Most studies are done in artificial environments with model plants or cultivars. Reviews by Bej and Basak (2017) and Li et. al (2017) combined the information on abiotic factors and the contribution of different epigenetic mechanisms for different species (Bej & Basak 2017; Li et al. 2017). ‌In the natural environment, plants are exposed to many abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, temperature, heavy metals. Epigenetic control of stress-responsive mechanisms was observed in several plant species under various abiotic stress conditions, such as extreme temperatures (Ding et al. 2019), drought (Huang et al. 2019), salinity (Yang and Guo 2018), herbivory, and pathogen (Holeski 2007). For example, increased salinity was associated with DNA methylation changes, histone acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation in species like rice, Arabidopsis thaliana, tobacco, and mangrove plants (Kim et al. 2015).

In Arabidopsis thaliana, histone modifications are involved in the drought stress response (Kim et al. 2015). For heat stress, DNA methylation differed between heat-sensitive and heat-tolerant genotypes in rapeseed (Gao et al.). And in forest trees (Cork oak), an interplay between DNA methylation and H3 acetylation was observed at elevated temperatures (Correia et al. 2013). Also, cold stress response in A. thaliana and maize affect DNA methylation and histone acetylation (Steward et al. 2002). An interesting example was recently reported by Song et al. (2015), who found that the alpine subnival plant Chorispora bungeana revealed DNA methylation changes that correlated with the exposure to chilling and freezing. Notably, several of the candidate genes were related to physiological chilling and freezing resistance pathways (Song et al. 2015). In summary, induced plant response following abiotic stress seems to be closely related to epigenetic mechanisms that even take an active role in the acclimatization to changing environmental conditions.

Table 1: List of epigenetic modifications reported for abiotic stress:

Components

Stress

Species

Function

References

DNA methylation

ZmMI1

Cold stress

Maize

Stress-induced non-reversible demethylation

Steward et al. 2000

Ac/Ds

Cold stress

Maize

Demethylation of transposon Ac/Ds

Steward et al. 2002

Tam 3

Low temp

Antirrhinum majus

Decrease in methylation

Hashida et al. 2006

NtGPDL

Aluminum, low temp, salt stress

Tobacco

Demethylation at coding region of gene

Choi and Sano 2007

HRS60 and GRS

Salt, osmotic stress

Tobacco

Reversible DNA hypermethylation

Kovarˇik et al. 1997

Histone modifications

AtGCN5

Cold stress

A. thaliana

Affect expression of COR genes

Stockinger et al. 2001 Vlachonasios et al. 2003

Ada2b

Freezing, salt stress

A. thaliana

Induces COR genes

Vlachonasios et al. 2003

SKB1

Salt stress

A. thaliana

Trimethylation of H4K3

Zhang et al. 2011

ABO1/ELO1

Drought stress

A. thaliana

Drought tolerance

Chen et al. 2006

ADH1 and PDC1

Submergence stress

Rice

Histone modifications of H3

Tsuji et al. 2006

HD6

Freezing stress

A. thaliana

Upregulation confer tolerance

To et al. 2011

HOS15

Cold stress

A. thaliana

Deacetylation of histone H4

Zhu et al. 2008

HDA6

Drought stress,cold

A. thaliana

Deacetylation

Kim et al. 2017 Jung et al. 2013

HDA9

Drought and salinity

A. thaliana

Deacetylation

Zheng et al. 2016

HDA15

Drought

A. thaliana

Deacetylation

Lee and Seo 2019)

HDA19

Drought, heat, salinity

A. thaliana

Deacetylation

Ueda et al. 2018a Chen and Wu 2010 Mehdi et al. 2016 Ueda et al. 2017

HDA705

Salinity

Rice

Deacetylation

Zhao et al. 2016

BdHD1

Drought

Brachypodium

Deacetylation

Song et al. 2019

ATX4/5

Drought

A. thaliana

Methyltransferase

Liu et al. 2018)

CAU1/PRMT5/SKB1

Drought and salinity

A. thaliana

Methyltransferase

Fu et al. 2013 Zhang et al. 2011

JMJ15

Salinity

A. thaliana

Demethylase

Shen et al. 2014

JMJ17

Dehydration

A. thaliana

Demethylase

Huang et al. 2019

JMJ15

Salinity

A. thaliana

Demethylase

Shen et al. 2014

JMJ17

Dehydration

A. thaliana

Demethylase

Huang et al. 2019

Small RNA

miR398

oxidative stress-causing agents such as high light levels, Cu2+, Fe3+ and methyl viologen

A. thaliana

posttranscriptional CSD1 and CSD2 mRNA accumulation and oxidative stress tolerance

Sunkar et al. 2007

miR393

Cold, dehydration, NaCl, and ABA stress

A. thaliana

miR393 is strongly upregulated by mentioned treatments

Sunkar and Zhu 2004

Last updated